Test automation consulting
Use senior consulting when the first problem is clarity.
This service is for buyers who know quality is affecting delivery but need a sharper diagnosis before they commit to a larger architecture or execution program. It combines automation assessment, delivery risk mapping, and practical prioritization so the team stops spending on the wrong fixes.
What buyers get
A direct diagnosis of the automation problem, not another abstract quality review.
The consulting engagement is designed to reduce decision risk for leadership. Instead of generic QA recommendations, the work identifies where release quality is breaking down, which test layers matter most, what ownership needs to change, and which improvements are most likely to pay back quickly.
Typical deliverables
- Current-state assessment of framework quality, suite health, CI signal, and ownership.
- Risk map covering flaky-test cost, defect-leakage exposure, and release blockers.
- Priority plan for the next 30, 60, and 90 days with action categories leadership can fund.
- Service recommendation on whether the next step should be architecture work, a sprint, or internal execution.
Typical timeline
- Days 1-3: discovery, artifact review, and stakeholder interviews.
- Days 4-7: diagnosis, prioritization, and written recommendations.
- Days 8-10: handoff and next-step alignment.
Business ROI
- Stops budget from being spent on symptoms instead of causes.
- Gives leadership a stronger narrative for why automation needs to change.
- Creates a faster path to visible improvement because the next move is clearer.
Expected outcomes
- Clearer diagnosis of the real bottleneck.
- Sharper decision on whether to stabilize, redesign, or pause.
- A plan the team can execute without another round of guesswork.
Next step
Here's what I'd do for your team.
Start with a short diagnosis, map the highest-cost failure modes, and leave you with a 30/60/90-day plan that the team can actually execute.
- Week 1: review suite health, CI signal, and ownership gaps.
- Week 2: prioritize fixes by cost and impact.
- Week 3: hand off a practical roadmap or continue into execution.